\n\n\u003Ch1>What’s This All About?\u003C/h1>\n\nThe short version: A few years back, the United States Federal Communication Commission, in response to numerous complaints and concerns, implemented a set of rules that prohibit Internet Service Providers from blocking specific content providers or charging them for access to their networks. Essentially, a set of rules that prevent your ISP from double-dipping on service \u003Cspan style=\"font-style: italic;\">you're\u003C/span> already paying them for, or blocking access to specific websites just for the hell of it.\n\nIn order to do this, they had to change how ISPs were classified, moving them from a \"Title I\" classification to \"Title II.” And now, the FCC, under a new chairman, is proposing to \u003Cspan style=\"font-style: italic;\">roll back\u003C/span> that change, which would then allow discriminatory treatment of Internet traffic.\n\nThis is a complicated issue, and sadly there is a lot of misleading information about it strewn around the ‘Net. \u003Ca href=\"https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/297816/net-neutrality-and-stack-overflow-stack-exchange\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" data-saferedirecturl=\"https://www.google.com/url?hl=en&q=https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/297816/net-neutrality-and-stack-overflow-stack-exchange&source=gmail&ust=1499919438470000&usg=AFQjCNF8N4mRjNELOELjU6vkiC7R9i254Q\">The companion discussion to this post\u003C/a> covers many perspectives on it in great detail, so please check it out before you make up your mind! For details on the technical aspects of net neutrality, please refer to \u003Ca href=\"https://networkengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/7924/network-neutrality-how-does-it-actually-work-technically-speaking\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" data-saferedirecturl=\"https://www.google.com/url?hl=en&q=https://networkengineering.stackexchange.com/questions/7924/network-neutrality-how-does-it-actually-work-technically-speaking&source=gmail&ust=1499919438470000&usg=AFQjCNELXjWe9uRrzxIr2moQhTH2oROe2Q\">this question on our Network Engineering site\u003C/a>.\n\n\u003Ch1>Why is This Relevant to Stack Overflow?\u003C/h1>\n\nHey, ain't like we're streaming video here, right? Downloading the entire archive of questions and answers on Stack Overflow would only use about as much data as watching 10 hours of Netflix.\n\nBut that's not an accident. We've known from the start that \u003Cspan style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">\u003Ca href=\"https://blog.codinghorror.com/performance-is-a-feature/\">performance is a feature\u003C/a>\u003C/span> and we’ve \u003Cspan style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">\u003Ca href=\"https://nickcraver.com/blog/2016/02/17/stack-overflow-the-architecture-2016-edition/\">worked really hard\u003C/a>\u003C/span> to make the site as fast as possible. We know that when your livelihood depends on plowing through a bunch of questions looking for an answer that works, the milliseconds add up pretty quickly.\n\nWe put insane amounts of time, skill and money into making it easy and fast for folks to share information with one another. It'd be a real shame if that was all for nothing because some major ISP decided to shake folks down for more money.\n\nAnd even if we could weather such a storm, even if it didn't result in an Internet where interconnection disputes made even trying to run a fast site a crap-shoot, what kind of an Internet would that leave for the \u003Cspan style=\"font-style: italic;\">next\u003C/span> programmer on a shoestring budget trying to build a fast new site? As tempting as it is to shrug and say, \"I got mine,\" the Internet has always worked because folks kept striving to do better - and had the opportunity to try. We owe it to the next generation to make sure that can happen.\n\n\u003Ch1>How You Can help\u003C/h1>\n\nFirst off, you can download and read the proposed rule-change \u003Cspan style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">\u003Ca href=\"https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/Query.do?numberFld=&numberFld2=&docket=17-108&dateFld=&docTitleDesc=\">from the FCC's website\u003C/a>\u003C/span>. Yes, it really has the ironic name \"Restoring Internet Freedom.” It's a little bit of a slog, but I highly encourage reading through the filing if you can spare the time - particularly the incredibly selective \"Background\" section.\n\nThen you can file a comment on the proposal. You can do this directly from the FCC's website (\u003Cspan style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">\u003Ca href=\"https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/search/filings?limit=25&proceedings_name=17-108&sort=date_disseminated,DESC\">or browse others' comments first if you prefer\u003C/a>\u003C/span>), but I highly recommend using that site I linked to above: \u003Cspan style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">\u003Ca href=\"https://www.battleforthenet.com/\">https://www.battleforthenet.com/\u003C/a>\u003C/span> - it's a lot less clunky, and automatically forwards your comments to your senator and representative. Which is helpful, since if you read that proposal you know that the big underlying problem we're facing here is that the FCC is trying to work with a framework of laws that \u003Cspan style=\"font-style: italic;\">predate the Internet as we know it\u003C/span>. Getting the folks who make the laws on board ain't a bad idea here.\n\n\u003Ch1>I have Strong Opinions on this post, how it relates to Stack Overflow, and Net Neutrality in general\u003C/h1>\n\nGreat! Let's hear 'em. Instead of yet another mess of blog comments that no one reads, I've kicked off a discussion over on Meta: - \u003Ca href=\"https://meta.stackexchange.com/questions/297816/net-neutrality-and-stack-overflow-stack-exchange\">please join in\u003C/a>!\n\n\u003Cdiv>\u003C/div>\n\n\u003Cdiv>\u003C/div>","html","2017-06-30T14:00:00.000Z",{"current":271},"raise-voice-proclaim-need-net-neutrality",[273,281,286],{"_createdAt":274,"_id":275,"_rev":276,"_type":277,"_updatedAt":274,"slug":278,"title":280},"2023-05-23T16:43:21Z","wp-tagcat-announcements","9HpbCsT2tq0xwozQfkc4ih","blogTag",{"current":279},"announcements","Announcements",{"_createdAt":274,"_id":282,"_rev":276,"_type":277,"_updatedAt":274,"slug":283,"title":285},"wp-tagcat-community",{"current":284},"community","Community",{"_createdAt":274,"_id":287,"_rev":276,"_type":277,"_updatedAt":274,"slug":288,"title":290},"wp-tagcat-company",{"current":289},"company","Company","Raise Your Voice: Proclaim the Need for Net Neutrality",[293,299,305,311],{"_id":294,"publishedAt":295,"slug":296,"sponsored":12,"title":298},"f0807820-02d7-4fc5-845f-3d76514b81c0","2025-08-11T16:00:00.000Z",{"_type":10,"current":297},"renewing-chat-on-stack-overflow","Renewing Chat on Stack Overflow ",{"_id":300,"publishedAt":301,"slug":302,"sponsored":12,"title":304},"e33464c4-b21b-4019-8b86-64a46335a95e","2025-08-07T16:00:00.000Z",{"_type":10,"current":303},"a-new-worst-coder-has-entered-the-chat-vibe-coding-without-code-knowledge","A new worst coder has entered the chat: vibe coding without code knowledge",{"_id":306,"publishedAt":307,"slug":308,"sponsored":12,"title":310},"8b04b236-51d5-4747-9de8-2fe6e6a2512e","2025-08-04T16:00:00.000Z",{"_type":10,"current":309},"cross-pollination-as-a-strategic-advantage-for-forward-thinking-organizations","Cross-pollination as a strategic advantage for forward-thinking organizations",{"_id":312,"publishedAt":313,"slug":314,"sponsored":12,"title":316},"5bddfa7a-32ce-4f9b-9919-10f03a9ef39b","2025-07-31T16:00:00.000Z",{"_type":10,"current":315},"do-ai-coding-tools-help-with-imposter-syndrome-or-make-it-worse","Do AI coding tools help with imposter syndrome or make it worse?",{"count":318,"lastTimestamp":319},4,"2023-05-25T09:46:19Z",["Reactive",321],{"$sarticleModal":265},["Set"],["ShallowReactive",324],{"sanity-GPTFQe5OU5BwTqgTomikEYUOT0TNQjm7BFFXO8erNUo":-1,"sanity-comment-wp-post-7356-1755447304306":-1},"/2017/06/30/raise-voice-proclaim-need-net-neutrality"]