\u003C/a>\n\nWe intend to (continue) spending money on \u003Ca href=\"http://careers.stackoverflow.com/\">Stack Overflow Careers\u003C/a>. Our goal is to \u003Cstrong>get every programmer a better job\u003C/strong>, and we want to do that without selling crazy-takeover-animated-bonzaibuddy-ads that feel like reading a newspaper on the subway (according to Joel), so we're getting money from investors instead.\n\nHow are we going to make this happen? We plan to revisit the developer side of the Careers equation and figure out how to make that better. More features to let programmers search and filter for interesting jobs (for example, you can look for \u003Ca href=\"https://stackoverflow.com/jobs/developer-jobs-using-javascript?utm_source=so-owned&utm_medium=blog&utm_campaign=dev-c4al&utm_content=c4al-link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Javascript jobs\u003C/a> or specifically \u003Ca href=\"https://stackoverflow.com/jobs/developer-jobs-using-nodejs?utm_source=so-owned&utm_medium=blog&utm_campaign=dev-c4al&utm_content=c4al-link\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Node.js jobs\u003C/a>), update the way profiles work, etc. - more of the stuff we were going to work on anyway. Careers is already a very developer-focused product: we limit the things our employers can do heavily based on what drives programmers nuts. For example, we only let employers contact a limited number of candidates \u003Cem>unless those candidates actually respond\u003C/em>, and we disallow contingency recruiters. (A pox on all of their houses.)\n\nYou can get a Careers profile \u003Ca href=\"https://careers.stackoverflow.com/cv/get-one\">here\u003C/a>. We filter the applications to make sure only real programmers end up with profiles on Careers.\n\nTime to take some questions from the peanut gallery!\n\n\u003Cul>\n \u003Cli>\u003Ca href=\"http://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/512?m=19637808#19637808\">\u003Cstrong>How will this [investment news] affect the sites?\u003C/strong>\u003C/a>\nNot one bit!\u003C/li>\n\u003C/ul>\n\nWell, a few bits. This cash will allow us to hire more designers, so more sites can graduate and get beautiful site designs. We'll get to hire more people to hit more of our goals at the same time. For example, one of the things we're actively working on now is \u003Ca href=\"http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/277584/feedback-requested-search-engine-usage\">improving search\u003C/a> on Q&A sites.\n\nHave we mentioned lately that \u003Ca href=\"http://stackexchange.com/about/hiring\">we're hiring\u003C/a>? Our most urgent need is for product managers, and you can apply for that job even if you've never had 'product manager' in your job title before.\n\n\u003Cul>\n \u003Cli>\u003Ca href=\"http://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/512?m=19638446#19638446\">\u003Cstrong>Will there be someone to represent the rage quitters?\u003C/strong>\u003C/a>\nYes. You're hired. Thanks for volunteering.\u003C/li>\n \u003Cli>\u003Ca href=\"http://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/512?m=19637981#19637981\">\u003Cstrong>Would you consider being an intermediary, putting a \"Buy This Person's Time\" on their profile page or answers?\u003C/strong>\u003C/a>\nNo! (Sorry, \u003Ca href=\"http://brentozar.com/\">Brent\u003C/a>.)\u003C/li>\n \u003Cli>\u003Ca href=\"http://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/19637973#19637973\">\u003Cstrong>Has the Stack Overflow design update changed user behavior?\u003C/strong>\u003C/a>\nWe've noticed a big uptick in the number of people complaining about how blue and cream go together. We've also gotten a lot of \u003Ca href=\"http://meta.stackoverflow.com/tags/design\">constructive feedback on meta\u003C/a> that we've used to inform tweaks (but it's really hard to distinguish those from comments about how people's cheese has been moved).\u003C/li>\n \u003Cli>\u003Ca href=\"http://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/19638186#19638186\">\u003Cstrong>Can you comment on whether SO rep is useful to a job search?\u003C/strong>\u003C/a>\nLots of employers out there don't know what Stack Overflow is, but Joel is going to use some of those 40 million dollars to educate them. But from our perspective, posting on Stack Overflow is more like blogging in that it can tell you a lot about a programmer and how they interact with the developer community. Stack Overflow reputation \u003Cem>alone\u003C/em> doesn't always tell you about the second half of \"smart and gets things done\".\u003C/li>\n \u003Cli>\u003Ca href=\"http://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/19638845#19638845\">\u003Cstrong>Will you be making a Windows Phone app?\u003C/strong>\u003C/a>\nNot for the foreseeable future. This question \u003Ca href=\"http://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/19638851#19638851\">makes our mobile lead sad\u003C/a>.\u003C/li>\n \u003Cli>\u003Ca href=\"http://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/19638237#19638237\">\u003Cstrong>Are there any plans to add a chat feature to the mobile application?\u003C/strong>\u003C/a>\n(Mobile lead Kasra just dropped dead.) We may add chat to the mobile app yet, but it's not in our 2015 plan.\u003C/li>\n \u003Cli>\u003Ca href=\"http://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/19638594#19638594\">\u003Cstrong>Are we going to ever allow wildcards in searches? Currently in chat it just nulls the search.\u003C/strong>\u003C/a>\nChat search is weird and backwards, but actual site search allows a certain amount of wildcards. This will get a better response if you post it \u003Ca href=\"http://meta.stackexchange.com/\">on Meta\u003C/a> and our search devs can actually respond!\u003C/li>\n \u003Cli>\u003Ca href=\"http://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/19639079#19639079\">\u003Cstrong>What happened to the videos idea?\u003C/strong>\u003C/a>\nWe first thought about \u003Ca href=\"http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/270574/an-experiment-stack-overflow-tv\">Stack Overflow TV\u003C/a> a while back. We hope to expand into areas of developer learning beyond questions and answers someday, and SOTV is one of those ideas. It will essentially be a YouTube channel with little introductory videos on topics in programming. The idea has hit some snags, but it's still on our radar.\u003C/li>\n \u003Cli>\u003Ca href=\"http://chat.stackexchange.com/transcript/message/19639168#19639168\">\u003Cstrong>Do you have any plans to run hackathons to promote local user groups?\u003C/strong>\u003C/a>\nYes! On a small scale, we make our office space available to local user groups who need a place to meet.\u003C/li>\n\u003C/ul>\n\nAnd we're out of questions. So what else is going on these days? \u003Ca href=\"http://blog.stackoverflow.com/2014/12/winter-bash-2014/\">Hats!\u003C/a> And some \u003Ca href=\"http://stackexchange.com/sites?view=list#newest\">new sites\u003C/a>. How about new features? We're experimenting with \u003Ca href=\"http://stackoverflow.com/review/triage\">a new triage queue\u003C/a> to help sort questions into \"hopeless and needs to be burninated\" and \"could be passable with some editing\" buckets. Things in the triage queue won't show up on the homepage until they've been approved. \u003Ca href=\"http://meta.stackoverflow.com/questions/278380/help-us-test-question-triage\">Here are the details\u003C/a>.\n\nJoel wants to sign off, but first make sure you check out \u003Ca href=\"http://expressionengine.stackexchange.com/\">Expression Engine SE's new design\u003C/a>. (Since this podcast was recorded, \u003Ca href=\"http://movies.stackexchange.com/\">Movies SE\u003C/a> has also graduated with a slick new theme.)\n\nThanks for wasting an hour on the Stack Exchange Podcast Episode #62, brought to you by the American Venture Capital Association.","html","2015-02-04T12:00:00.000Z",{"current":527},"podcast-62-delete-this-whole-episode",[529,537,542],{"_createdAt":530,"_id":531,"_rev":532,"_type":533,"_updatedAt":530,"slug":534,"title":536},"2023-05-23T16:43:21Z","wp-tagcat-announcements","9HpbCsT2tq0xwozQfkc4ih","blogTag",{"current":535},"announcements","Announcements",{"_createdAt":530,"_id":538,"_rev":532,"_type":533,"_updatedAt":530,"slug":539,"title":541},"wp-tagcat-company",{"current":540},"company","Company",{"_createdAt":530,"_id":543,"_rev":532,"_type":533,"_updatedAt":530,"slug":544,"title":546},"wp-tagcat-podcast",{"current":545},"podcast","The Stack Overflow Podcast","Podcast #62 - Delete This Whole Episode",[549,555,560,565],{"_id":550,"publishedAt":551,"slug":552,"sponsored":12,"title":554},"1d082483-6dc6-424b-8b09-9c84b54779da","2025-09-02T17:00:00.000Z",{"_type":10,"current":553},"back-to-school-developers-at-stack-overflow-have-some-advice-for-you","Back to school? Developers at Stack Overflow have some advice for you",{"_id":556,"publishedAt":551,"slug":557,"sponsored":12,"title":559},"5cd91820-9515-4be5-87ae-e919fd443c18",{"_type":10,"current":558},"getting-started-on-stack-overflow-a-step-by-step-guide-for-students","Getting started on Stack Overflow: a step-by-step guide for students",{"_id":561,"publishedAt":551,"slug":562,"sponsored":12,"title":564},"614538a9-c352-4024-adf1-fa44a9f911b6",{"_type":10,"current":563},"stack-overflow-is-helping-you-learn-to-code-with-new-resources","Stack Overflow is helping you learn to code with new resources",{"_id":566,"publishedAt":551,"slug":567,"sponsored":12,"title":569},"763b1d36-83d8-4178-9c2d-32d705ea1d7b",{"_type":10,"current":568},"introducing-your-newest-study-buddy-stackoverflow-ai","Introducing your newest study buddy: stackoverflow.ai",{"count":571,"lastTimestamp":12},0,["Reactive",573],{"$sarticleModal":574},false,["Set"],["ShallowReactive",577],{"sanity-imelCfaOsYMgWa9y7_lRqcSGokPdIFgHh1Q2LBKcwk0":-1,"sanity-comment-wp-post-5060-1756855475250":-1},"/2015/02/04/podcast-62-delete-this-whole-episode"]